A. Consideration of Resolution No. 22-1084 appointing and reappointing members to the Parks and Recreation Leadership Board and Board of Trustees of the Olathe Parks and Recreation Foundation.

[A. Consideration of Resolution No. 22-1084 appointing and reappointing members to the Parks and Recreation Leadership Board and Board of Trustees of the Olathe Parks and Recreation Foundation.]

NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS A SPECIAL BUSINESS ITEM.

A IS CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 1084.

APPOINTING AND REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PARKS AND REC RECREATION LEADERSHIP BOARD AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OLATHE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION.

DO I HEAR MOTION? MR. MAYOR, I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22 DASH 1084 REGARDING THESE APPOINTMENTS.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. BACON? YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MS. FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS.

VOTE. YES.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

OUR PARKS AND RECREATION LEADERSHIP BOARD IS A KEY PART OF THE PROCESS TO ENSURE OUR PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATIONAL PROGRAMING REFLECT THE NEEDS AND WANTS OF THE COMMUNITY.

AND AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO WELCOME FORWARD GREG FOSS TO THE PODIUM TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW AND REAPPOINTED MEMBERS.

GREG, THANKS FOR BEING HERE.

THANK YOU. IT'S NICE TO BE WITH YOU ALL TONIGHT.

COUNCIL AND MAYOR, MY NAME IS GREG FOSS.

I'M REPRESENTING THE PARK AND REC FOUNDATION BOARD.

WE'VE GOT ONE NEW MEMBER THAT'S GOING TO BE JOINING US, TIM RICHARDS.

TIM, IF YOU WOULD, COME ON UP.

WE'RE GREAT TO HAVE TEN BEING INVOLVED.

HE'S GOT 32 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH THIS CITY, WORKING WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, RETIRED A FEW YEARS AGO BUT WANTS TO GET BACK INVOLVED.

SO WE'RE EXCITED TO HAVE HIS EXPERIENCE AND RESOURCES TO HELP US.

OCH, THIS CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT SAYS THIS IS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TIM RICHARD HAS BEEN APPOINTED TO THE ALETHA CITY O BY THE OLATHE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION LEADERSHIP BOARD.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS? ALL RIGHT. OKAY.

WE HAVE PHIL ARBUCKLE HERE TONIGHT.

PHIL HAS BEEN ON THE BOARD SINCE 2018, VERY ACTIVE AND PARTICIPATING IN ALL THE DIFFERENT EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES THAT FOUNDATION PARTNERS WITH THE CITY ON PHIL.

THIS IS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT PHIL ARBUCKLE HAS BEEN APPOINTED BY THE OLATHE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION LEADERSHIP BOARD.

ALL RIGHT.

OUR NEXT RENEWAL IS JIMMY ADAMS. I DON'T THINK JIMMY MADE IT.

I DIDN'T SEE HIM COME IN.

JIMMY'S ALSO BEEN ON THE BOARD SINCE 2018 AND BEEN VERY ACTIVE IN PARTICIPATION AS WELL AND THE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE INVOLVED IN.

OKAY. I CAN.

WE HAVE A BOARD MEETING ON THURSDAY.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE WANT TO THANK ALL OUR VOLUNTEERS AND FOR THEIR DEDICATION IN DONATING OF THEIR TALENTS TO HELP OUR CITY.

SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

[B. Consideration of Resolution No. 22-1085 appointing and reappointing members to the Olathe Historic Preservation Board.]

ITEM B IS CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22 DASH 1085 APPOINTING AND REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE OLATHE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.

TO HER MOTION, I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22 DASH 1085 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND. THE MOTION.

AND FOR THE CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

MS.. VOTE YES.

MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES, MISS FELTER? YES. MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY. YES.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

[00:05:01]

THE OLATHE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PLAYS A CRITICAL ROLE IN PRESERVING AND CELEBRATING OLATHE HISTORY AS A CITY THAT IS 165 YEARS OLD.

WE HAVE A LOT TO CELEBRATE.

SO AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO BRING FORWARD BOARD.

THE STAFF LIAISON IS GOING TO COME UP FIRST.

EMILY CARRILLO'S GOING TO INTRODUCE THE FIRST INDIVIDUAL THAT'S BEEN APPOINTED.

REAPPOINTED. YES.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND WELCOME OUR OR RECOGNIZE OUR APPOINTEE THAT AS OUR CHAIRMAN, BOB COURTNEY.

BOB IS A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE PRESERVATION BOARD, WHICH WE STARTED BACK IN 2009.

AND HE HAS SERVED AS OUR CHAIRMAN SINCE 2019.

SO HE HAS THAT IS A DUTY THAT HE ESCAPED FOR NEARLY A DECADE, WHICH IS A FEAT IN AND OF ITSELF WITH THIS BOARD.

BUT BOB IS REALLY THE ESSENCE OF COMMUNITY SERVICE, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND ALL THINGS PRESERVATION RELATED.

IN OLATHE, HIS KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY IS SO VERY IMPORTANT NOT ONLY TO OUR BOARD BUT ACROSS THE COMMUNITY, AND THAT IS EVIDENT IN HIS COMMITMENT TO SERVICE.

SO IT IS MY PRIVILEGE THIS EVENING TO HAVE HIM REAPPOINTED AGAIN AND SERVE ANOTHER TERM FOR THE OLATHE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.

WELL.

THIS IS BOB CERTIFICATE OF REAPPOINTMENT.

THIS IS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BOB COURTNEY HAS BEEN APPOINTED TO THE BY THE ALETHA CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON THE OLATHE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.

THANK YOU. YOU GO THROUGH THE INDUSTRY, YOU HAVEN'T CALLED IT, BUT IT'S BEEN AMAZING TO ME THE AMOUNT OF HISTORY THAT WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO DISCOVER IN A LATHAM WORKING FOR THE ELECTED SCHOOL DISTRICT, WORKING WITH THE ALETHA, THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND ON THE PRESERVATION BOARD.

SO THIS TIME I'D LIKE TO CALL UP TOM, COME ON UP.

AND TABITHA.

SO. IF YOU'D LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS, YOU'RE WELCOME TO.

ARE YOU. ARE YOU GOING TO INTRODUCE ANY.

LET ME INTRODUCE TOM COURTNEY FIRST.

HE'S BEEN AN EMPLOYEE OF THE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR 38 YEARS, TEACHING AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, AMERICAN HISTORY, US GOVERNMENT. HE HAS A BACHELOR'S AND MASTER'S DEGREE.

HE'S A MEMBER OF THE OLATHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY, A MEMBER OF THE RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.

AND FOR VOLUNTEER WORK, HE'S AS AN AUDIO READER, TRAVELING TO LAWRENCE TO FULFILL THAT DUTY.

IT'S A COMMUNITY SERVICE THING THAT HE DOES.

I WILL POINT OUT THAT IT'S NOT COURT APPOINTED COMMUNITY SERVICE, BUT NOT ANYMORE.

NO. TABITHA SMITH IS BEING APPOINTED TO THE BOARD FOR THE FIRST TIME.

SHE'S BEEN WITH THE US ARMY.

SHE IS A SECURITY SPECIALIST.

SHE DOES BACKGROUND CHECKS AND INVESTIGATIONS FOR AND NATIONAL SECURITY.

SHE HAS A BACHELOR'S AND MASTER'S DEGREE.

FAIRLY NEW TO ALETHA.

SEVEN YEARS HERE, AS I UNDERSTAND IT.

AND WE WE WELCOME PEOPLE WITH FRESH EYES ON ALETHA AND WE'LL SHARE WITH THEM THE HISTORY OF WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED.

JUST. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE.

THE ONLY THING I CAN SAY TO THE COUNCIL.

LET'S GO FISHING.

YEAH.

WE WANT TO THANK THOSE INDIVIDUALS THAT VOLUNTEER ONE MORE TIME FOR THEIR IMPORTANT SERVICE TO OUR COMMUNITY.

WELL, NOW MOVE ON TO HOLD ON JUST A MINUTE.

I LOST MY PLACE.

[A. Public Hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 22-1086 for an IRB amount increase request by BCB Holdings LLC expressing intent to issue industrial revenue bonds and tax phase-in for the development and construction of buildings totaling 385,000 square feet for industrial uses in the Southpark Olathe Industrial Phase II area development.]

PUBLIC HEARINGS.

AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 1086 FOR AN IRB AMOUNT INCREASE REQUEST BY BCB

[00:10:10]

HOLDINGS LLC, EXPRESSING INTENT TO ISSUE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS AND PHASE IN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS TOTALING 385,000 SQUARE FEET FOR INDUSTRIAL USES IN THE SOUTH PARK.

OLATHE INDUSTRIAL PHASE TWO AREA DEVELOPMENT.

THIS APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN BONDS FROM ABOUT $23 MILLION TO NO MORE THAN 30 MILLION.

BUSINESS ANALYST JOSH RUSHKOFF JOINS US FOR A PRESENTATION.

WELCOME, JOSH. GOOD EVENING.

RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS JOSH RUSHKOFF.

I'M A BUSINESS ANALYST WITH THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

I'LL BE PRESENTING ON THREE SEPARATE IRBS TONIGHT.

THE FIRST OF THESE ARE BCB HOLDINGS LLC S PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PROJECT.

THE QUARTER FOR THIS PROJECT WAS FIRST INTRODUCED ON JUNE 15TH OF 2021 WITH A REPORT IN A PUBLIC HEARING AND A RESOLUTION.

AND PUBLIC HEARING THAT FOLLOWED ON JULY 6TH OF 2021.

A REQUEST WAS MADE BY THE DEVELOPER TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF BONDS ISSUED FROM APPROXIMATELY 23 MILLION TO 30 MILLION, AND A NEW REPORT WAS PRINTED IN THE LAST MONTH ON NOVEMBER 15.

TONIGHT, WE'LL PERCEIVE THE NEXT THREE PARTS OF THE IRB, THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT, AND THEN THE ORDINANCE ISSUING THE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS.

NOW WE'LL PROCEED WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY A VOTE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT.

HERE YOU'LL SEE THE PROJECT OUTLINE ON THE MAP.

THIS IS A PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE PROJECT CAN BE SEEN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOUNTAIN DRIVE AND FRONTIER LANE.

THE PROJECT WILL BE ON APPROXIMATELY 34 ACRES OF LAND AND THREE BUILDINGS ARE PROPOSED AS WE'LL DISCUSS IN THE NEXT SLIDE.

TO SUMMARIZE THE PROJECT.

IT'S A $30 MILLION DEVELOPER.

INVESTMENT IS BEING MADE ON SITE FOR THREE BUILDINGS THAT WILL TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 385,000 SQUARE FEET IN AGGREGATE.

THE AMOUNT OF INVESTMENT WAS ORIGINALLY FOR 23,230,000.

IN JUNE OF 2021, WITH THE REQUEST INCREASED 30 MILLION REPORTED LAST MONTH.

AND THESE BUILDINGS ARE BEING DEVELOPED AS INDUSTRIAL SPACE.

A POTENTIAL IRB PROJECT, AS YOU KNOW, HAS TO MEET SEVERAL QUALIFICATIONS PER THE CITY'S IRB POLICY.

AS YOU SEE LISTED HERE, IT HAS TO MEET MINIMUM INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW BUSINESSES.

THE PROJECT MUST PRODUCE A VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AND IT MUST PROVIDE A POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF 1 TO 1.3 FOR A COST BENEFIT RATIO.

YOU'LL SEE HERE THE COST BENEFIT RATIO OF 1.71 AND 135 NEW JOBS ARE PROJECTED OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

THE FIRST YEAR AVERAGE SALARY OF THE PROJECT FOR A BUSINESS FOR.

JOBS AT THE PROJECT WILL START AT $42,000, AND THAT WILL PROVIDE APPROXIMATELY 50,555,000 IN TOTAL NEW WAGES OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS. THE CURRENT CITY PROPERTY TAX RECEIVED FROM THE PROPERTY IS $91.

AND THAT WILL RISE TO AN ESTIMATED ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX TO THE CITY OF $44,063 DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD AND OVER THE TEN YEAR PERIOD OF THE ABATEMENT, IT'S ESTIMATED THE CITY WILL RECEIVE $440,630 IN PROPERTY TAXES.

JUST A QUICK RECAP OF THE INCENTIVE TIMELINE.

THE ORIGINAL REPORT WAS FOR 23,230,000, AND THAT REPORT WAS GIVEN ON JUNE 15, 2021.

IT WAS FOLLOWED BY A PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION ON JULY 6TH OF 2021.

AND LAST MONTH, ON NOVEMBER 15TH, A NEW REPORT ON THE $30 MILLION PROJECT WAS GIVEN.

AND TONIGHT, WE'LL CONSIDER THE PUBLIC HEARING THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT AND THE ORDINANCE TO ISSUE THE REVENUE BONDS.

HEARING FOR THE ORDINANCE WILL FOLLOW TWO MOTIONS HERE AFTER WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND AFTER WE HAVE A CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO APPROVE IN THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND WE'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS NOW.

OKAY. THANKS, JOSH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? HAS ANYONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK? A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD BE IN ORDER.

I MOVE. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION. AND SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. MCCOY? YES.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

[00:15:01]

NOW WE HAVE TO VOTE ON THAT RESOLUTION.

THAT'S WHAT I'M INTRODUCING RIGHT NOW.

OH, I'M SORRY. YEAH.

SO SORRY.

YEAH. SO I DON'T HAVE TO REREAD IT.

IT'S BASICALLY EVERYTHING I SAID BEFORE.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PARTICULAR RESOLUTION? ITEM B, IT'S ITEM A ITEM THERE COMBINED.

OH YEAH, IT'S DIFFERENT.

ITEM A IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

AND WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN IT IS IT HAS THE RESOLUTION AS WELL.

AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT ON C AND D AS WELL, I.

VERY TRICKY. IT'S OKAY.

OKAY. SO WE HAVE A CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 86, 1086.

I'M SORRY. MY MISTAKE.

I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 1086 AS PRESENTED SECOND.

WE HAVE A MOTION IN SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

MISS. VOTE YES.

MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES, MISS FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES. MOTION PASSES.

SIX ZERO. NOW WE'RE MOVING ON TO ITEM B, THIS CONSIDERATION.

[B. Consideration of Ordinance No. 22-59 authorizing issuance of the City's taxable industrial revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $30,000,000 to BCB Holdings, LLC, Series 2022, for the construction of three industrial buildings totaling 385,000 sq. ft. located at the northwest corner of Fountain Drive and Frontier Lane in the Southpark Olathe Industrial Phase II area development.]

BOARD NUMBER 22, DASH 59, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF THE CITY'S TAXABLE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 30 MILLION.

TO BCB HOLDINGS LLC SERIES 2022 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 385,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOUNTAIN DRIVE AND FRONTIER LANE IN THE SOUTH PARK.

ALETHA INDUSTRIAL PHASE TWO AREA DEVELOPMENT.

THIS ITEM IS TO ISSUE THE BONDS THAT WE JUST DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS ITEM.

ANY QUESTIONS OF JOSH OR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? WE READY? A MOTION WOULD BE IN ORDER.

I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22 DASH 59 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE'RE GOOD NOW.

[C. Public Hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 22-1087 for a request by ABF Freight System, Inc. expressing intent to issue industrial revenue bonds and tax phase-in for construction of a 28,330 square foot warehouse and distribution facility on 7 acres at the Olathe Commerce Park on Pine and Dennis.]

WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM C.

ITEM. I'D LIKE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 1087 FOR A REQUEST BY ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM INC.

EXPRESSING INTENT TO ISSUE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS AND TAX PHASE IN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 28,330 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ON SEVEN ACRES AT THE ALETHA COMMERCE PARK ON PINE AND DENNIS.

THIS PROPOSAL IS A MORE IS A MORE THAN $13 MILLION INVESTMENT THAT WOULD CREATE 32 JOBS OVER THE NEXT DECADE WITH AN AVERAGE SALARY OF ALMOST 65,000 A YEAR. BUSINESS ANALYST JOSH RUSHKOFF JOINS US AGAIN FOR A PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. AND NOW I'LL BE COVERING, AS WE JUST DISCUSSED, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC..

THE REPORT FOR THIS PROJECT WAS INTRODUCED ON THE NOVEMBER 15TH MEETING.

AND TONIGHT, WE'LL PROCEED WITH THE NEXT TWO PARTS, AS WE DID WITH THE PRIOR ONE, WITH A PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY THE VOTE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN A VOTE TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION FOR THIS PROJECT.

AB PROJECT WILL SIT ON APPROXIMATELY SEVEN ACRES OF LAND IN THE ALETHA COMMERCE CENTER.

THIS WILL BE LOCATED NORTH OF DENNIS AVENUE ON PINE STREET IN THE COMMERCE CENTER, AS YOU CAN SEE, OUTLINED ON THE MAP AND THE BLUE WITH THE BLUE OUTLINE.

THE PROJECT HAS APPROXIMATELY 13,400,000 AND DEVELOPER INVESTMENT BEING MADE FOR 28,330 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE.

THE SPACE IS GOING TO BE USED FOR OFFICE, WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION AND TRUCK TERMINAL USES.

THE BUSINESS ABF IS INVOLVED IN MOTOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION AND THIS WAS SUBMITTED UNDER A MASTER RESOLUTION THAT WAS ORIGINALLY FOR A TOTAL INVESTMENT OF APPROXIMATELY $42 MILLION ON 60 ACRES OF LAND.

AS WE SAW BEFORE, IRBS HAVE TO QUALIFY UNDER THE CITY'S IRB POLICY.

SOME OF THE REQUIREMENTS YOU SEE HERE, THEY HAVE TO MEET A MINIMUM BUSINESS INVESTMENT FOR NEW BUSINESSES.

THE PROJECT MUST PRODUCE VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES AND PROVIDE A POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF 1 TO 1.3 FOR THEIR COST BENEFIT RATIO.

THIS PROJECT'S COST BENEFIT RATIO IS 1.59.

THERE ARE 32 NEW JOBS PROJECTED OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS OF THE PROJECT AND THE FIRST YEAR AVERAGE SALARY IS ALMOST $65,000 ANNUALLY.

THIS IS PROJECTED TO TOTAL $23,815,000 IN TOTAL NEW WAGES OVER THE TEN YEARS OF THE ABATEMENT.

THE CURRENT ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX FOR THE CITY IS $1,557, AND THAT WILL RISE TO AN ESTIMATED ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX TO THE CITY OF $15,680. IT'S ESTIMATED THAT THE CITY WILL RECEIVE PROPERTY TAX OF $156,800 OVER THE TEN YEAR OF THAT DATE.

[00:20:02]

OVER THE TEN YEARS OF THAT ABATEMENT PERIOD.

JUST TO RECAP REALLY QUICKLY, THE INCENTIVE TIMELINE.

THE REPORT FOR THIS PROJECT WAS INTRODUCED ON NOVEMBER 15, AND TONIGHT WE'LL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL AS THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT AND WILL CONSIDER ISSUANCE OF THE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS AT A LATER DATE.

INCLUDES THE PRESENTATION FOR ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS AND STAFF WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, JOSH. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR JOSH ON THIS SIDE OF.

A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

DID ANYONE SIGN UP? NO, SIR.

A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.

I MOVE. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MS..

FILTER. YES, MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES.

MS.. VOTE YES.

MR. BACON. YES.

MS.. ESSEX? YES.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

ALL RIGHT. NOW, THIS ONE HAS THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT TIED TO IT AS WELL.

SO A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION WOULD MOVE THE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 1087 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER COMMENTS ON THIS? NONE WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MS..

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

[D. Public Hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 22-1088 for a request by BPG Olathe 1, LLC expressing intent to issue industrial revenue bonds and tax phase-in for the construction of a 140,490 square foot industrial facility under a master resolution at the northeast corner of 159th Street and Lone Elm Road.]

ITEM D IS I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22, DASH 1088 FOR A REQUEST REQUEST BY BPG ALETHA ONE, LLC EXPRESSING INTENT TO ISSUE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS AND TAX PHASE IN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 141,490 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL FACILITY UNDER A MASTER RESOLUTION AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 159TH STREET AND LONE ELM ROAD.

THIS IS AN ALMOST $16 MILLION PROJECT THAT WOULD CREATE 94 NEW JOBS OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS WITH AN AVERAGE SALARY OF $38,000 A YEAR.

JOSH IS HERE AGAIN FOR A PRESENTATION.

THE FLOOR IS YOURS, SIR.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. AND NOW I'LL BE COVERING LAST BPG ALETHA ONE LLC.

THIS IS THEIR BUILDING C PROJECT.

THE REPORT FOR THIS IAB PROJECT WAS AGAIN INTRODUCED ON NOVEMBER 15 LAST MONTH.

TONIGHT, WE'LL PROCEED IN TWO PARTS AGAIN, AS WE DID BEFORE WITH PUBLIC HEARING AND A VOTE TO CLOSE THE HEARING, FOLLOWED BY A VOTE TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT. AS YOU'LL SEE HERE, BUILDING C IS LOCATED NORTH AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 159TH STREET AND LONE ELM ROAD.

THE ADDRESS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE 15 770 SOUTH DAYTON STREET.

COMPLETION. THE NEXT PHOTO WILL SHOW YOU A CLEARER VIEW OF WHERE THAT STREET WILL RUN NEXT TO THE PROJECT ON THE SOUTH SIDE.

THE PROJECT SITS ON APPROXIMATELY 9.23 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GREAT PLAINS COMMERCE CENTER.

TO SUMMARIZE THE PROJECT, IT'S A $15 MILLION $845,999 DEVELOPER INVESTMENT APPROXIMATELY 140,490 SQUARE FEET FOR DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE FACILITIES.

THIS IS SPECULATIVE DEVELOPMENT.

IT WAS SUBMITTED UNDER MASTER RESOLUTION WITH A TOTAL INVESTMENT OF APPROXIMATELY $77 MILLION ON 771 AND ONE HALF ACRES OF LAND.

AS WE STATED BEFORE, ACCORDING TO OUR OUR RB POLICY.

NEW PROJECTS HAVE TO MEET SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS AND SO THEY HAVE TO MEET A MINIMUM INVESTMENT REQUIREMENT FOR NEW BUSINESSES.

THE PROJECT MUST PRODUCE A VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS AND SERVICE AND PROVIDE A POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT, WHICH IS MEASURED BY A COST BENEFIT RATIO BETWEEN ONE AND 1.3.

THIS. THIS PROJECT PROVIDES A COST BENEFIT RATIO OF 1.5 FOR ITS PROJECTED PRODUCED 94 NEW JOBS OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

DURING THE ABATEMENT AND THE FIRST YEAR AVERAGE SALARY IS APPROXIMATELY 38,000.

THIS IS PROJECTED TO PROVIDE 40,950,000 TOTAL NEW WAGES OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

THE CURRENT ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX IS $26 ON THIS PROPERTY, AND THAT'S ESTIMATED TO RISE TO AN ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX TO THE CITY OF $22,498.

AND THAT'S ESTIMATED TO PROVIDE APPROXIMATELY $224,980 OVER THE TEN YEAR ABATEMENT PERIOD.

JUST TO RECAP AGAIN VERY QUICKLY, THE TIMELINE FOR THIS INCENTIVE FOR BUILDING C, IT WAS INTRODUCED ON NOVEMBER 15TH, LAST MONTH, AND TONIGHT ON DECEMBER 6TH, WE'LL HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL AS THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT.

THE ORDINANCE AND ISSUING THE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS WILL BE CONSIDERED AT A LATER DATE.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU THINK ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? HAS ANYONE SIGNED UP ON THIS? THEN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD BE IN ORDER.

[00:25:01]

I MAY HAVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. BACON. YES.

MS.. ESSEX. YES.

MS. FELTER YES.

MR. GILMORE. YES.

MR. MCCOY. YES, MISS.

VOTE YES. MOTION PASSES.

SIX ZERO. SO A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION 22 DASH 1088 WOULD BE IN ORDER.

I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 22, DASH 1088 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. YES.

VOTE YES.

MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES, MISS FELTER? YES. MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

[8. CONSENT AGENDA]

WE'LL NOW MOVE TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

MAY BE APPROVED IN ONE MOTION.

THESE MAY INCLUDE ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN A PRIOR PLANNING SESSION.

THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION UNLESS A COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.

COUNCILMEMBER MCCOY.

I DON'T E AND I DON'T.

JUST A SECOND HERE.

I DON'T KNOW YOU. AND WHY.

EU AND WHY.

AND I WOULD LIKE TO PULL ITEM J ANY OTHERS? MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WOULD BE IN ORDER WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF E, J, U, AND Y SO MOVED.

WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. MCCOY. YES, MR. VOTE. YES.

MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES, MISS FELTER.

YES, MR. GILMORE. YES.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

[E. Consideration of the property and casualty insurance programs for 2023.]

ITEM E IS CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR 2023.

COUNCIL MEMBER MCCOY.

HE PULLED THAT ITEM? YES.

I WAS LOOKING AT OUR RENEWAL.

IT WAS COMING UP. AND OBVIOUSLY, IF YOU LOOK AT ALL THE CLAIMS GOING ON AROUND THE COUNTRY, YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY PROPERTY RATES ARE GOING UP.

BUT IN LOOKING OVER THE COVERAGES THAT WE HAVE, ONE OF THE AREAS THAT I DID NOT SEE ON THERE WAS ABOUT CYBERSECURITY INSURANCE AND JUST QUESTIONING WHY THAT WOULD NOT BE WITHIN THIS PACKAGE.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR COUNCIL CHRISTOPHER GREENWALD, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY AND GREAT QUESTION.

COUNCILMEMBER MCCOY.

SO NOT ALL OF OUR INSURANCE IS ON THE SAME SCHEDULE, THE SAME RENEWAL SCHEDULE.

SO IN THIS CASE, CYBER IS ON A DIFFERENT SCHEDULE AND IT'S MARCH IS WHEN WE RENEW ON THAT.

SO WE'RE COMING UP, WE'LL BE GOING INTO MARKET IN JANUARY AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE BRING TO YOU GUYS SEPARATELY.

YEAH, I KNOW THAT'S PROBABLY A SPECIALTY INSURANCE ANYWAY, BECAUSE OF ALL THE CLAIMS THAT ARE TAKING PLACE AROUND THE WORLD AND IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA.

SO BUT THAT'LL BE COMING UP PROBABLY IN THE NEXT 45 OR 60 DAYS OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE.

YEAH, YOU'LL I WOULD EXPECT WE'LL BE WORKING ON IT AT THE FIRST CORNER AND YOU'LL SEE IT IN MARCH.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON ITEM E MOTION.

BE IN ORDER. I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEM AGENDA E SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND WITH THE CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. MCCOY. YES, MISS.

VOTE YES. MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MS. FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE. YES.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

[J. Consideration of Resolution No. 22-1090, SU19-0008, requesting approval of a renewal of a special use permit for a quarry operation on approximately 244 acres; located at 23775 W. 159th Street. Planning Commission recommends approval 8-1.]

ITEM J IS CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 22 TWO 1090, WHICH IS ALSO SUE 19 EIGHT REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A RENEWAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A QUARRY OPERATION ON APPROXIMATELY 244 ACRES LOCATED AT 23775 WEST 159TH STREET PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A RECOMMENDED APPROVAL 8 TO 0.

I PULLED THIS ITEM BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AND HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

SO THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT, BUT IT'S BEEN OUR TRADITION THAT IF WE HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ABOUT AN ITEM THAT'S DIRECTLY AFFECTING THEM, WE ALLOW THAT.

SO DO WE HAVE THAT INDIVIDUAL'S NAME? WOULD YOU LIKE TO INTRODUCE THEM AND THEN MAYBE EXPLAIN TO THEM THE RULES? YES. THE COUNCIL HAS EXTENDED THE PRIVILEGE ALLOW EXCUSE ME, EXTENDED THIS PRIVILEGE TO ALLOW PEOPLE THAT LIVE AND WORK IN A WAY TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS TO THE CITY COUNCIL SPEAKERS.

MS. ONLY ADDRESS THE COUNCIL COUNCIL MEMBERS.

MEMBERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RESPOND.

THE COUNCIL HAS ALLOCATED 3 MINUTES FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING AND WE WELCOME RANDY KRISEL TO THE PODIUM.

WELCOME, RANDY. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.

MY NAME IS RANDY CRYSTAL, AND MY WIFE CYNTHIA AND I RESIDE AT 24 120 WEST 167TH STREET, ALETHA.

I'M ASKING FOR AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SETBACK ON THE FOURTH PAGE FOUR OF THE QUARRY RESOLUTION SO THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE CURRENT UDL LANGUAGE.

[00:30:04]

THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE CURRENT UDL LANGUAGE IS TO PROTECT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.

IT WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN 2019 AND IT NEEDS TO BE ENFORCED.

THE RESOLUTION RESIDENTIAL SETBACK CURRENTLY STATES QUOTE FOR ABOVE GROUND OPERATIONS 750 FEET FROM ANY RESIDENTS OR RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY UNQUOTE TO COMPLY WITH THE USUAL LANGUAGE.

IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO QUOTE FOR ABOVE GROUND OPERATIONS 1000 FEET FROM AN EXISTING RESIDENCE OR THE NEAREST PROPERTY LINE OF RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY, WHICHEVER ACHIEVES THE GREATER OVERALL SETBACK.

END QUOTE. I NOTE THAT THE UEO ALLOWS A PLANNING COMMISSION OR GOVERNING BODY TO REDUCE THE 1000 FOOT RESIDENTIAL SETBACK BY UP TO 90%, BUT THAT IS ONLY ALLOWED IF SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ARE MET.

IF THE APPLICANT SHOWS THAT COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY ORDINANCES RELATED TO NOISE, DUST, VISIBILITY AND OPERATIONS WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE RESIDENTS FROM THE ABOVE GROUND OPERATIONS.

APPLICANT MUST SHOW THIS I FOUND NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD BEFORE YOU WHERE THE APPLICANT HAS SHOWN THAT RESIDENTS WILL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IF THE 1000 FOOT RESIDENTIAL SETBACK IS REDUCED TO 750 FEET.

AND REMEMBER THAT THE OPERATIONS THAT MOVE CLOSER TO US.

INCLUDES THE LANDFILL IS AN ACCESSORY, USE A LANDFILL THAT IS SO INCOMPATIBLE WITH RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT THE USE MATRIX RESTRICTS IT TO ONLY RM THREE ZONING AND ONLY WITH A SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

A PERMIT FOR WHICH NEIGHBORS WOULD HAVE PROTEST PETITION WRITES.

THIS LANDFILL PERMIT ISSUE WAS DISCUSSED IN COMMENTS INCLUDED WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION PACKET THAT YOU HAVE.

AND I WANT TO SUGGEST AN ALTERNATE SETBACK SOLUTION.

INSTEAD OF REDUCING THE 1000 FEET FOOT RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS TO INCREASE THE APPLICANT'S OPERATIONS AREA, THERE ARE A COUPLE OF OTHER SETBACKS COULD BE REDUCED AND STILL COMPLY WITH THE UDL. THE SETBACK FOR 159TH STREET COULD BE REDUCED FROM 150 FEET TO 50 FEET.

THE SETBACK FROM OLD 56 HIGHWAY COULD BE REDUCED FROM 150 FEET TO 50 FEET.

THESE SETBACK REDUCTIONS COMPLY WITH THE UDL, WHICH, ALTHOUGH IT REQUIRES 100 FOOT SETBACKS FROM THE STREET, IT ALLOWS THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR GOVERNING BODY TO REDUCE THAT BY UP TO 50% BECAUSE THE HIGHWAY RIGHT AWAY.

THESE SETBACK REDUCTIONS WOULD PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH AN OPERATIONS AREA SIZE COMPARABLE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL SETBACK.

SO WHY COME TOWARD US PICK ON THOSE OTHER SETBACKS THAT DON'T AFFECT US? THAT'S IT. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS HERE.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL SINCE WE ALLOWED.

OTHER FOLKS. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS PETE HEAVEN.

MY ADDRESS IS 6201 COLLEGE BOULEVARD IN OVERLAND PARK, AND I REPRESENT THE HAM COMPANIES.

AND THANK YOU FOR HAVING US TONIGHT.

WE'VE UNDERSTOOD WHAT MR. KRIEGEL SAID. HE MADE THE SAME ARGUMENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

HE OVERLOOKS ONE VERY IMPORTANT, TWO VERY IMPORTANT ISSUES, THOUGH.

THE FIRST OF WHICH IS WE HAVE BEEN DOING ACTIVE MINING IN THIS SETBACK AREA FOR YEARS.

IT'S NOT NEW.

WE'RE NOT EXPANDING OUR OUR OR CONTRACTING OUR SETBACKS.

WE'RE MERELY WORKING WITHIN THEM.

BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE UDOT HAS ANOTHER EXCEPTION THAT MR. KRISEL DID NOT POINT OUT, AND THAT IS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CAN REDUCE THE SETBACKS UP TO 50% IF A RAILROAD TRACK ADJOINS THE QUARRY PROPERTY, WHICH IT DOES IN THIS CASE.

SO WE COULD HAVE ASKED FOR A 500 FOOT SETBACK.

WE'RE WILLING TO STAY WITH THE 750, AND WE BELIEVE WE'VE BEEN GOOD NEIGHBORS.

WE'VE HAD NO COMPLAINTS.

WE RESPECT MR. KRIEGEL. HE'S A GREAT NEIGHBOR AND A GOOD FRIEND, BUT WE JUST DISAGREE ON THIS POINT.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, PETE, FOR BEING HERE. ANY QUESTIONS? I DON'T SEE ANY. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? I THINK A MOTION WOULD BE IN ORDER ON ITEM J.

I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF ITEM J, WHICH IS RESOLUTION 22, DASH 1090 SUE 19 DASH 0008 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. GILMORE. YES.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

[00:35:04]

THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE.

ON THAT ITEM, J.

[U. Consideration of the purchase of Glock Handgun Weapon System to replace current handgun weapon system for the Police Department.]

WE'LL NOW MOVE TO ITEM U CONSIDERATION OF THE PURCHASE OF GLOCK HANDGUN WEAPON SYSTEM TO REPLACE CURRENT HANDGUN WEAPONS SYSTEMS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

COUNCIL MEMBER MCCOY PULLED THIS ITEM.

YEAH. CHIEF, I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.

I SEE THAT WE ARE REPLACING THE THE HANDGUNS WITH WITH NEW GUNS.

AND I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT DIFFERENCES THE NEW GUNS WILL HAVE OVER THE OLD GUNS AND HOW OFTEN WE MAKE THIS CHANGE.

YEAH. MIKE BOUCHARD, POLICE CHIEF.

SO THE QUICK ANSWER IS TYPICALLY ABOUT 5 TO 7 YEARS.

SO THE CURRENT FIREARM I HAVE IS MY FIFTH AND MY 30 YEARS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.

BUT REALLY, ALTHOUGH IT'S TIME TO DO THAT, WHAT WE'RE MOST INTERESTED IN IS GETTING A NEW SIGHTING SYSTEM THAT COMES ALONG WITH THIS MODEL HANDGUN.

IT'S A QUICKER IT'S MORE EFFECTIVE WAY FOR US TO ACQUIRE A TARGET.

IT'S A LOT SAFER.

WITH THIS SYSTEM, YOU KEEP BOTH EYES OPEN INSTEAD OF THE OLD IRONSIDES CLOSING ONE EYE, SO YOU GET TO SEE A BIGGER PICTURE OF THINGS THAT ARE GOING ON AROUND YOU. SINCE I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE HANDGUN THAT HAVE A LASER ON IT OR ANYTHING LIKE THIS.

NO, IT HASN'T.

IT HAS A LITTLE APERTURE PICTURE THAT HAS A RED DOT IN THE MIDDLE OF IT.

IT DOESN'T BROADCAST IT.

SO IT'S NOT ON IT'S NOT LIKE A LASER.

IT'S JUST A FLOATING DOT INSIDE OF AN APERTURE.

I KNEW THERE WAS A REASON BEHIND IT.

I JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE ANSWER WAS.

SO THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM YOU SEEING ON A MOTION? BE IN ORDER? IF THE APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM YOU SECOND MOTION.

WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MS. FELTER YES, MR. GILMORE. YES, MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS.

VOTE YES.

MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

NOW MOVE TO ITEM Y, WHICH IS CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR AN UPDATED INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LATE THE PUBLIC LIBRARY AND THE

[Y. Consideration of approval for an updated Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the Olathe Public Library and the Johnson County Library for automated circulation, customer, and bibliographic services.]

JOHNSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOR AUTOMATED CIRCULATION CUSTOMER AND BIOGRAPHIC SERVICES.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICES.

SORRY ABOUT THAT. COUNCILMEMBER COY, YOU PULLED THAT ONE? I DID. YOU KNOW, I SERVED ON A LIBRARY BOARD FOR OVER A DECADE, AND SO I WAS AWARE THAT WE HAD AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH JOHNSON COUNTY.

AND AS I WAS READING OVER THE INFORMATION THAT WE RECEIVED, THAT I GUESS BASED ON POPULATION, IS HOW WE DERIVE OUR PERCENTAGE OF WHAT THE TOTAL WOULD BE. SO JOHNSON COUNTY HAS X NUMBER OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS THAT THERE AS A AS A BUILDING VERSUS US GOING OUT AND RECREATING A WHOLE NEW ANIMAL, SO TO SPEAK.

WE'RE ABLE TO USE WHAT THEY HAVE AND GET A DISCOUNTED AMOUNT, SO TO SPEAK, FOR OUR EBOOKS OR AUDIO THINGS THAT WE GET FROM THE SUBSCRIPTIONS. AND SO THE 23.3%, OBVIOUSLY, IT'S GONE UP EVERY YEAR SINCE 2020.

AND WITH US JUST HEARING THAT OUR POPULATION IS JUST UP TO AROUND 154,000 YEAR THAT LAST WEEK, 151, OUR 51,000 I GUESS I'M BEING OVER POSITIVE, 51,000.

AND WHAT THESE RATES HERE WERE BASED ON 143,000.

SO OBVIOUSLY WE'LL PROBABLY BE LOOKING AT A HIGHER FEE NEXT YEAR, BUT IT'S A LOT LESS EXPENSIVE THAN BUYING THE WHOLE PACKAGE, SO TO SPEAK.

IS THAT CORRECT? WELL, THAT IS POSSIBLE.

OVER THE COURSE OF TIME, WE HAVE BEEN IN THE 23% RANGE IN TERMS OF SHARING CONTENT WITH JOHNSON COUNTY.

THAT HAS NOT CHANGED BECAUSE THEY ARE GROWING AS WELL.

THE REST OF THE COUNTY IS CORRECT.

CORRECT. SO THE 23% HAS BEEN FAIRLY STEADY OVER THAT TIME AND WE DON'T REALLY ANTICIPATE A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.

OKAY. AND I'M JUST CATCHING YOU OFF OFF THE AIR WITHOUT ME CALLING YOU ON THIS IN THE PAST LIKE AN E BOOK.

YOU CAN ONLY CHECK IT OUT SO MANY TIMES, AND THEN YOU LOSE YOUR DATA.

IS IT STILL THE SAME WAY OR DO WE DO WE SEE AS MANY PEOPLE USING THE E BOOKS AS THEY DO THE PHYSICAL COPIES, OR HOW IS THAT WORKING OUT NOW? YES, COUNCILMAN, WE'VE SEEN A TREMENDOUS INCREASE IN THE USE OF E-BOOKS, A LOT OF THAT DUE TO THE COVID PANDEMIC THAT WE EXPERIENCED STARTING IN 2020.

SO AS A RESULT, WE WITH JOHNSON COUNTY, WE UPPED OUR PURCHASING OF CONTENT FOR THE TO SERVE THOSE CUSTOMERS.

BUT THEN ALSO THIS YEAR, WE ADDED A NEW APP CALLED THE LIBBY APP, WHICH IS MUCH BETTER THAN THE ACCESS 360 APP THAT WE WERE PREVIOUSLY USING.

[00:40:07]

AND AS A RESULT, WE'VE RECEIVED MUCH MORE USAGE FROM THE CUSTOMERS, WHICH RESULTED IN AN INCREASE IN COST THIS YEAR, A SHARED INCREASE BETWEEN JOHNSON COUNTY AND THE PUBLIC LIBRARY.

WELL, I THINK ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT COMES OUT OF THIS, OF WHAT WE PAY, YOU KNOW, AS JOHNSON COUNTY EMPLOYEES OF THE LIBRARY SYSTEM, ARE UPDATED ON NEW EDUCATION, ON HOW THINGS WORK, THEN WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO TAP INTO THAT IN THE TRAINING OF NEW APPS AND THINGS OF THIS NATURE.

YES, SIR. OKAY.

AND I DO KNOW THAT I WAS AT THE LEAGUE OF KANSAS MUNICIPALITIES AND WE HAD SOME SPEAKERS SPEAKING OF OUR LIBRARY SYSTEM AND OUR ONE, WE HAVE INCREASED PEOPLE FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY COME TO LOOK AT THAT JUST BECAUSE MARVELING AT THE FACT THAT WE'VE TAKEN A FORMER HIVE INTO WHAT WE HAVE NOW, WHICH IS A MAGNIFICENT LIBRARY AND WE HAVE A MAGNIFICENT LIBRARY SYSTEM AND EVERYBODY RAVES ABOUT IT.

AND SO WE DON'T HAVE TO RAVE ABOUT OURSELVES, BUT IT'S NICE WHEN OTHER PEOPLE DO IT.

SO NICE JOB.

SO THANK YOU FOR THAT, BOB.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STEPH OR BOB? THANKS FOR BEING HERE. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM Y WOULD BE IN ORDER.

I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM Y.

SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MISS ESSEX.

YES, MISS FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS VOTE.

YES, MR. BACON. YES. MOTION PASSES.

SIX ZERO. NOW MOVE ON TO NEW BUSINESS ITEM A IS CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22.

[A. Consideration of Ordinance No. 22-60, RZ22-0010, requesting approval for a rezoning from the CP-O (Planned Office Building) District to the R-1 (Residential Single-Family) District and a preliminary plat for OSOS Manor, containing two (2) lots on approximately 1.07 acres; located at the northeast corner of W. Santa Fe and N. Olathe View Road. Planning Commission recommends approval 9 to 0.]

DASH 60 AS Z 22, DASH TEN REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A REZONING FROM THE CPO PLANNED OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT TO THE ARE ONE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT AND A PRELIMINARY PLIGHT PLAT FOR OS MANOR CONTAINING TWO LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 1.07 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST SANTA FE AND NORTH ALETHA VIEW ROAD.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL 9 TO 0.

THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS INTENDED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

IS THERE NEED FOR A PRESENTATION ON THIS ITEM? I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION OF STAFF.

GOOD EVENING. IS THAT MORE PLANE OR TWO? YEAH. WELCOME, ZACH.

MY QUESTION ON THIS IS A DRIVEWAY ON SANTA FE RIGHT THERE AT THAT BUSY INTERSECTION OF MONTICELLO TO THE SOUTH AND NORTH VIEW, L8 THE VIEW ROAD.

IT'S VERY DIFFICULT.

AND I HAVE WITNESSED CARS JUST TO HELL WITH THE TRAFFIC AND TO JUST BACK OUT ONTO SANTA FE, WHICH I THINK IS VERY DANGEROUS.

AND I'M SURE THEY GET FRUSTRATED, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE SANTA FE IS VERY BUSY, IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO GET BUSIER.

SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF THE IF THE PROPERTY THAT HAS THE DRIVE DIRECTLY ON TO SANTA FE, IF THEY COULD SOMEHOW ACCOMMODATE A C DRIVE OR SOMETHING WHERE PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE TO BACK OUT OF THEIR RESIDENCE ONTO SANTA FE.

RIGHT. ELIMINATE THAT.

RIGHT. BASED ON THE WIDTH OF THAT LOT, I BELIEVE A C DRIVEWAY WOULD BE CHALLENGING.

HOWEVER, WE CAN EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR A HAMMERHEAD ON THERE SO THEY'D BE ABLE TO KIND OF ANGLE UP AND THEN BACK AND THEN TURN BACK DOWN AND HEAD OUT ON TO SANTA FE.

WE CAN CERTAINLY WORK WITH THE APPLICANT.

YEAH, I THINK EITHER WAY IT PROBABLY TO THE WEST WOULD BE TOWARDS THE OTHER PROPERTY.

I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ENOUGH ROOM.

IT SEEMED LIKE THAT WAS MUCH LARGER.

A LOT. PROBABLY ALMOST TWICE THE SIZE.

NOT QUITE, BUT.

SO. YEAH, WHATEVER WE CAN DO.

I JUST DON'T LIKE THAT.

BACKING ACTION ONTO BUSY SANTA FE.

CERTAINLY WE CAN ABSOLUTELY WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON ON FINDING A SOLUTION THAT DOESN'T HAVE TRAFFIC BACKING OUT INTO SANTA FE.

I THINK THAT'D BE GREAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON STAFF FROM STAFF ON THIS ITEM? THE MOTION WOULD BE IN ORDER TO MOVE THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22.

DASH 60 REGARDING R.C.

20 2-00 TEN.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS.

VOTE YES. MR. BACON. YES, MISS.

YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MS. FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE? YES.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

ITEM B IS CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22, DASH 61, WHICH IS RS 20 2-0012 REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A REZONING FROM THE CP TO PLANNED

[B. Consideration of Ordinance No. 22-61, RZ22-0012, requesting approval of a rezoning from the CP-2 (Planned General Business) District to the M-2 (General Industrial) District and a preliminary site development plan for Contractor’s Garage VIII on approximately 2.28 acres; located at 2107 E. Kansas City Road. Planning Commission recommends approval 8-1.]

GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO THE M2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND A PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONTRACTORS GARAGE THE EIGHTH ON APPROXIMATELY 2.28 ACRES LOCATED AT 2107 EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL 8 TO 1.

THIS REZONING IS REQUESTED TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CONTRACTORS GARAGE, WHICH PROVIDES STORAGE AND OFFICE SPACE FOR AREA CONTRACTORS.

[00:45:08]

PLANNING PLANNERS ACT.

MOORE JOINS US AGAIN FOR A PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. GOOD EVENING.

COUNCIL MEMBER ZACHARY MOORE PLANNER TWO AS INTRODUCED, THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 2.28 ACRES FROM THE CP TWO DISTRICT TO THE M2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND A PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONTRACTORS GARAGE LOCATED AT 2107 EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD.

SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD AND IS JUST NORTH OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY ELECTION OFFICE.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED IN 1965 AND THEN LATER REZONED TO THE CP TWO DISTRICT IN 2008.

AND THIS REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO THE M2 DISTRICT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS.

THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTH ARE ALL INDUSTRIALLY ZONED.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE PLAN.

ALETHA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO IDENTIFIES THIS PROPERTY PARTIALLY AS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA AND PARTIALLY WITHIN THE URBAN MIXED USE CENTER.

THE PROPOSED M2 DISTRICT DOES ALIGN DIRECTLY WITH THE INDUSTRIAL AREA OF FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION, AND STAFF HAS FOUND THAT THE REQUEST ALIGNS WITH SEVERAL OTHER GOALS OF THE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED INCLUDES 32,000 SQUARE FEET OVER THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS USED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S GARAGE USE.

AS YOU MENTIONED, THESE BUILDINGS ARE LABELED A, B AND C, AND THEY'LL BE REFERRED TO THAT WAY THROUGHOUT THE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING.

ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE PROVIDED AT ONE LOCATION ON EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD, AND THE SITE INCLUDES 45 PROPOSED PARKING STALLS, 32 OF WHICH WILL BE ACTUALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE INDIVIDUAL UNITS THAT THE CONTRACTORS WOULD LEASE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE 45 PARKING STALLS PROPOSED MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS TYPE OF USE.

THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED EXCEEDS IDO REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING.

THE APPLICANT DID PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EVERGREEN PLANTINGS ALONG THE NORTH FACADE OF THAT BUILDING.

A TO SOFTEN THAT THE VIEW OF THAT FACADE FROM EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD.

ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING A 20 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD, WHICH WILL ALSO INCLUDE A FIVE FOOT TALL, POWDER COATED DECORATIVE ALUMINUM FENCE ON THERE THAT WILL TIE IN TO THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AS WELL.

SO THE THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS WILL ALL HAVE A CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL THEME, WHICH YOU WILL SEE HERE.

THESE IMAGES ON THE SCREEN ARE THE PRIMARY FACADES.

FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, THERE ARE FOUR IN TOTAL.

THE TWO AT THE TOP WOULD BE THE TWO DIRECTLY FACING EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD, AND THESE MEET OR EXCEED UDOT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING DESIGN FOR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS.

ALL OF THE BUILDINGS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF STONE STUCCO, GLASS AND METAL PANELS AS AN ACCENT MATERIAL.

AND THE APPLICANT IS, HOWEVER, REQUESTING A TOTAL OF THREE WAIVERS FOR THE NORTH FACADES OF BUILDING B AND BUILDING A, WHICH ARE THE TWO IMAGES ON THE BOTTOM HALF OF THE SCREEN HERE. THE IMAGE IN THE MIDDLE IS THE NORTH FACADE OF BUILDING A.

HERE. AND THE BOTTOM ONE IS THE NORTH FACADE OF BUILDING B, WHICH WOULD FACE INTERIOR TO THE SITE.

SO JUST REAL QUICK ON THOSE WAIVER REQUESTS.

THE FIRST ONE IS FOR ALLEVIATION FROM SOME OF THE GARAGE DOOR TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ANY FACADES THAT FACE A PUBLIC STREET THAT HAVE GARAGE OR OVERHEAD DOORS. WE'VE GOT THREE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY HAVE TO MEET.

ONE BEING AN ARCHITECTURALLY TREATED DOOR, THE SECOND BEING A TWO FOOT RECEPTION, THIRD BEING A THREE FOOT CANOPY.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ALLEVIATION FROM THE TWO FOOT RECESSION REQUIREMENT AND THE THREE FOOT CANOPY REQUIREMENT.

THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED AN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ON THESE DOORS THAT IS HIGHER QUALITY THAN WE TYPICALLY SEE WITHIN A GARAGE OR OVERHEAD DOORS.

BY PROVIDING GLASS ON THESE DOORS, AS WELL AS A HIGH QUALITY ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL RATHER THAN A STANDARD GARAGE DOOR TO BE USED ON THAT SITE.

SO STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THAT ALTERNATIVE HIGH QUALITY DESIGN FOR THESE GARAGE DOORS, AND THAT WOULD ONLY APPLY FOR THE FACADE ON BUILDING B AND THESE UNITS. NEXT, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN GLASS FOR THESE TWO PRIMARY FACADES FOR BOTH BUILDINGS AND BUILDING.

B, THE REDUCTION TO 0% FOR THE NORTH FACADE OF BUILDING A AND TO 6% FOR THE NORTH FACADE OF BUILDING B STAFF IS REVIEWED IN A SUPPORTIVE OF THIS WAIVER AS WELL. DUE TO THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE BUILDINGS, CONTRACTORS WOULD USE THESE TO STORE MATERIALS AND VEHICLES.

SO WITH HAVING A HIGHER AMOUNT OF GLASS WOULD INCREASE A VIEW SHED INTO THOSE STORAGE AREAS.

SO STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THAT WAIVER REQUEST DUE TO THAT FUNCTIONALITY OF THE BUILDING THERE.

[00:50:02]

AND LASTLY, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR VERTICAL ARTICULATION FOR PRIMARY FACADES.

CODE REQUIRES THAT EVERY 50 LINEAR FEET, A FOUR FOOT ROOF, PLANE CHANGE OR ROOF PITCH CHANGE WOULD BE REQUIRED.

AND DUE TO THE SIZE AND SCALE OF THESE BUILDINGS, A FOUR FOOT CHANGE WOULD APPEAR OUT OF SCALE.

NOT TO MENTION WOULD APPEAR TO HAVE A TACKED ON LOOK WHICH OUR CODE ACTUALLY SPEAKS AGAINST AS WELL.

INSTEAD, THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN THAT STILL PROVIDES VERTICAL VISUAL INTEREST BY PROVIDING THESE PILASTERS AS WELL AS STONE COLUMNS.

AND THESE ARE LOCATED EVERY 40 FEET ALONG THESE PRIMARY FACADES, WHICH IS ACTUALLY MORE FREQUENT THAN OUR CODE REQUIREMENT OF 50 FEET.

SO THEREFORE, FOR THAT, ALTERNATIVE QUALITY DESIGN STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THAT WAIVER.

BACK WITH THE ZONING RECOMMENDATION, STAFF ANALYZED THE SURROUNDING AREA AND DUE TO LAND USE PATTERNS AND THE SIZE AND SCALE OF THESE PROPOSED USES COMPARED TO THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING PARCEL STAFF HAS FOUND THAT THERE ARE SEVEN USES.

IT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE FOR HIM TO DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY.

STAFF WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE APPLICANT ON THIS LIST AND THE APPLICANT IS AMENABLE TO THESE USES.

BEING PROHIBITED ON SITE AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF REZONING TO THE INTO DISTRICT WITH THIS ONE STIPULATION REGARDING USE PROHIBITION.

ADDITIONALLY, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WITH THREE WAIVERS WHICH ARE ALL RELATED TO THOSE WAIVER REQUESTS THAT WE WALKED THROUGH IN PLANNING.

COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS WITH AN 8 TO 1 VOTE.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I'LL STAND BY FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE FOR QUESTIONS AS WELL.

QUESTIONS OF STAFF.

DID YOU. COUNCIL.

I'M SORRY. COUNCIL MEMBER VOTE RON BUTTON TOO MANY BUTTONS.

MAN RIGHT. QUICK QUESTION.

OF COURSE. THE SUMMARY TALKS ABOUT CONTRACTORS, GARAGE PROVIDING STORAGE AND OFFICE SPACE.

WHAT I SEE IS PRIMARILY STORAGE.

I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WOULD HAVE OFFICE WRITE THE INTENT FOR AN OFFICE TYPE OF USE HERE WOULD BE VERY LIMITED.

MAYBE A DESK WHERE THEY FILL OUT SOME INVOICES OR RECEIPTS LIKE THAT.

MAYBE KEEP FILE CABINETS, BUT NOTHING, NOTHING ELABORATE, NOTHING WITH MULTIPLE DESKS.

IT WOULD PRIMARILY BE THAT STORAGE FUNCTION.

YES. OKAY. BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ANY BATHROOM FACILITIES.

WE DON'T. SO REALLY, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT STORAGE, RIGHT.

AND THERE IS ONE COMMON USE BATHROOM THAT WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE VERY NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING A ONLY FOR TENANTS OF THE SITE.

THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE IS ABOUT THE PARKING.

IF YOU CAN GO TO THE SLIDE THAT SHOWS PARKING.

SO IT LOOKS LIKE.

YOU'VE GOT JUST THE PARKING SPOTS AT THE END.

HOW MANY ARE THERE? AND SO THERE WILL BE 13 PARKING STALLS THAT ARE NOT WITHIN THE ACTUAL UNITS THEMSELVES BECAUSE.

THESE UNITS.

THEY MAY HAVE VEHICLES IN THEM, BUT IF THEY'RE STORAGE, THEY WON'T HAVE VEHICLES IN THEM.

SO I'M JUST LOOKING AND OBVIOUSLY THERE WOULD BE NO OTHER PARKING, CORRECT.

EXCEPT IN THOSE STALLS.

SO THERE WOULD HAVE THE OPTION TO POTENTIALLY HAVE A PARALLEL SPOT.

WHERE IS THAT? IN FRONT OF A UNIT.

SORRY, THAT IS NOT WORKING.

FOR PERMANENT PARKING.

NOT FOR PERMANENT PARKING.

THAT WOULD BE JUST VERY DROP OFF PICK UP.

CORRECT. THAT'S IT. THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING ABOUT.

BECAUSE I WOULD IMAGINE FIRE LINES, CODE.

YOU WOULD NOT WANT THAT, RIGHT? RIGHT. AND WE HAVE EVALUATED WE'VE WORKED WITH OUR FIRE TEAM.

THEY'VE REVIEWED, EVEN IF THERE WERE TO BE A CAR PARK THERE AT THE TIME, THAT A THAT A TRIP INTO THE SITE WOULD BE NECESSARY, THERE'S ADEQUATE SPACE TO TURN AROUND BACK HERE.

BUT AGAIN, THERE IS NO PERMANENT PARKING THERE.

CORRECT. 24 SEVEN EXCEPT IN THE STORAGE UNIT ITSELF AS WELL AS THE BAYS AT THE END.

CORRECT. OKAY. BECAUSE OCCASIONALLY, AS YOU WELL KNOW, AND SOME OF OUR STORAGE UNITS AND IN THE AREAS, THERE'S SOMETIMES TRUCKS AND VARIOUS VEHICLES THAT ARE PARKED LONG TERM AND THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE.

JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S CLEAR.

AND THEN AS FAR AS TRAFFIC STUDY, TELL ME, I KNOW YOU RESPONDED, BUT I'LL ASK THE QUESTION ABOUT TRAFFIC AND IF THIS IS ADEQUATE, IF THERE'S ANY CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS IN AND OUT ON KANSAS CITY ROAD.

RIGHT. OUR TRAFFIC TEAM DID REVIEW AND HAD NO CONCERNS WITH THE REQUEST.

A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WAS NOT REQUIRED WITH THIS APPLICATION.

IS THE THIS TYPE OF USE AND THIS SIZE ONLY AVERAGES ABOUT 80 AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS WHEREAS THE THE WARRANT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES 100 AVERAGE DAILY

[00:55:02]

TRIPS AND THEN THE LAST.

WHAT IS THE VIEW FROM MY 35 VIEW FROM MY 35 IS GOING TO BE VERY LIMITED.

THERE ARE SOME TREES THAT ARE BACK HERE AS WELL AND THE APPLICANT WILL BE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING.

ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS THAT RAIL ROAD THAT RUNS ALONG THERE, SO IT'S GOING TO BE SCREENED PRETTY WELL.

AND WE HAVE. YEAH, THE COAL TRUCKS ARE USUALLY OR.

YEAH, YEAH, WE KNOW.

VERY GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.

COUNCILMEMBER MCCOY YOU KNOW, ZACH, I THINK YOUR ANSWER ONE QUESTION REGARDING THE TO THE EAST OF WHAT'S GOING TO BE THERE.

AND AS YOU SAID, THERE'S A TRAIN TRACKS THERE AND THERE WILL BE SOME SHRUBS AND SOME TREES AND THINGS LIKE THAT, WHICH WOULD THAT YOU WOULDN'T.

AND OF COURSE THE TRAINS ARE GOING BY.

YOU WON'T SEE TOO MUCH THROUGH THERE.

MAYBE I MISSED IT. BUT NOW TO THE TO THE NORTH, YOU SAID THERE'S GOING TO BE MORE TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED ALONG THERE, BUT THERE'S NO FENCING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, CORRECT? NO FENCING SEPARATING THIS PROPERTY FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.

BUT THERE WILL BE A FENCE ALONG EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD.

OKAY. SO YOU WERE MENTIONING OFFICES AS A POSSIBLE OFFICE OR WHATEVER THE MANAGEMENT THERE.

WILL THEY BE MANAGEMENT THERE LETTING PEOPLE IN AND OUT OR HOW WILL THIS WORK? I MEAN, IN TERMS OF OF THE BECAUSE I KNOW SOME STORAGE FACILITIES WHICH ARE LARGER BUILDINGS, THEY HAVE ACTUALLY SOMEONE THERE THAT HAS TO LET SOMEBODY IN TO GET INTO THEIR LOCKERS OR STORAGE FACILITIES.

RIGHT? YEAH. SO THERE'S NOT A GATE PROPOSED ON SITE.

THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE DEVELOPER OF THIS USE WOULD RENT OUT THESE INDIVIDUAL UNITS.

THEY COME AND GO. CORRECT.

OKAY, ANSWER MY QUESTION.

THANK YOU. I DON'T SEE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

THANK PSAC. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM? ZACH, REAL QUICK.

I GUESS THIS IS A REQUEST FOR M2 ZONING.

IT'S SURROUNDED BY M2.

THIS DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE.

MUCH DIFFERENT THAN THE SURROUNDING USES.

IS THAT CORRECT? I MEAN, AS FAR AS A HEAVIER USE OF MTU THAN IT'S ALREADY EXISTING IN THIS LOCATION, CORRECT? YEAH. THIS IS GOING TO BE PRETTY COMPATIBLE WITH ALL THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT.

LIGHTER INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK THERE JUST TO THE WEST, ACROSS THE EAST KANSAS CITY ROAD AND THEN A USE WITH A VERY SIMILAR USER.

AT THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY NORTH.

OKAY VERY GOOD THANK YOU.

LOOK A MOTION BE IN ORDER.

WE HAVE THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22 DASH 61 RELATING TO 20 2-00 12.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. MCCOY. YES, MISS.

VOTE YES. MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MS. FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE? YES.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

[D. Consideration of Ordinance No. 22-63 calling for an April 25, 2023 election in the City for the purpose of voting on a proposition to authorize the City to levy a one-eighth of one percent special purpose citywide retailers’ sales tax to be used to repair, restore, improve, and acquire public parks, trails, and recreation areas in the City and to enhance library services.]

THE NEXT TWO ITEMS CALL FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR RESIDENTS TO TO CONSIDER THE RENEWAL OF BOTH OUR STREET MAINTENANCE AND PARK SALES TAXES.

[C. Consideration of Ordinance No. 22-62 calling for an April 25, 2023 election in the City for the purpose of voting on a proposition to authorize the City to renew a three-eighths of one percent special purpose citywide retailers’ sales tax to be used to repair, rebuild, and rehabilitate the streets in Olathe.]

DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE MARY YEAGER JOINS US FOR A PRESENTATION.

WELCOME, MARY. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

IF YOU REMEMBER LAST MONTH, MIKE TURNER, THE DIRECTOR OF QUALITY OF LIFE AND MYSELF, WERE HERE TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT PARK SALES TAX AND STREET MAINTENANCE.

SALES TAX. UNFORTUNATELY, MIKE STERN IS NOT ABLE TO BE HERE TONIGHT.

BUT WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE PROPOSED RENEWAL OF BOTH THE PARK SALES TAX AND THE STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX.

WE WILL ALSO REVIEW THE TIMELINE AND THE SPECIFIC BALLOT LANGUAGE.

LET'S START WITH THE PARK SALES TAX RENEWAL.

IN NOVEMBER OF 2014, THE CITIZENS OF OLATHE APPROVED A18 PERCENT SALES TAX, WHICH FUNDS THE REPAIR, RESTORATION, IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION OF PUBLIC PARKS AND TRAILS, ALONG WITH LIBRARY AND RECREATION SERVICES IN THE CITY.

IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE SALES TAX NOT ONLY PAID IS PAID FOR BY OUR RESIDENTS, BUT ALSO ANYONE THAT SHOPS IN ALETHA.

THE CURRENT RENEWAL OF THE PARK SALES TAX BEGAN ON APRIL 1ST OF 2015 AND IT SUNSETS MARCH 31ST OF 2025.

THIS MAP SHOWS QUITE A BIT OF PROGRESS THAT WE'VE MADE SINCE THE RENEWAL OF THE PARK SALES TAX.

THIS MAP SHOWS THE CONSTRUCTION OR MAJOR REFRESH OF SEVEN PARKS, AND THAT INCLUDES TWO SIGNATURE PARKS, LAKE ALETHA AND LONO PARK.

IT INCLUDES THE MAJOR REPAIR OR REFRESH OF 16 NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PARKS, AS WELL AS THREE NEW TRAILS THAT HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED OR ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION CURRENTLY. THE CURRENT SALES TAX BROUGHT US MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS.

QUALITY OF LIFE AND AND I WOULD SAY LEGACY IMPROVEMENTS.

AND OF THOSE THERE INCLUDED THE COMMUNITY CENTER, LONE ELM PARK, STAGECOACH PARK, AND NEARLY 20 MILES OF NEW TRAILS TO CONNECT US.

[01:00:04]

ONE OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS IS LIKE ALETHA PICTURED HERE THAT SHOWS BOTH THE OVERVIEW OF THE PARK, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, IT SHOWS THE BEACH AND THE MARINA.

THERE ARE SO MANY AMENITIES OUT THERE THAT WE'RE ABLE TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BECAUSE OF THIS PARK SALES TAX.

IT ALSO INCLUDES TRAILS SUCH AS MEADOW LANE AND CEDAR CREEK.

BUT WE'VE DONE MORE WITH THIS PARK SALES TAX EVEN TO CONNECT TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PARK SYSTEM.

AND THAT'S REALLY WHEN WE PARTNERED WITH JOHNSON COUNTY FOR THE CEDAR NILE'S TRAIL.

THAT'S UP BY THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.

WE ALSO REPAIRED PORTIONS OF INDIAN CREEK TRAIL AND EXTENDED CEDAR CREEK TRAIL.

WE DID NEW PARKS, WE REFRESHED PARKS.

THIS IS CALAMITY LINED PARK COMPLETED IN 2022, VERY POPULAR WITH OUR YOUNGER GENERATION.

AND THE NEW INDIAN CREEK PARK WAS BUILT IN COORDINATION WITH THE LIBRARY AS THE FIRST FULLY ACCESSIBLE PARK, AND THAT OPENED IN 2019 2020. IN THE COMING YEAR, WE'RE GOING TO SAY TWO NEW NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS.

PHASE TWO OF A TRAIL PROJECT THAT WILL TAKE YOU ALL THE WAY FROM LAKE ALETHA TO CEDAR LAKE.

THIS YEAR, ETSY DID A MASTER PLAN SURVEY FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN, AND THAT SURVEY REALLY TOLD US TO FOCUS ON THE MAINTENANCE OF OUR PARKS AND FACILITY, FOCUS ON CONNECTIVITY OF TRAILS AND OUR PATHWAYS BOTH WITHIN OLETA AND REGIONALLY, AND ALSO THE QUALITY AND NUMBER OF OUTDOOR AMENITIES THAT WE PROVIDE TO OUR PUBLIC.

THE MASTER PLAN SURVEY ECHOED.

SORRY, THE MASTER PLAN SURVEY ECHOED BY RESIDENTS THAT THEY WANTED NEW TRAILS AND TRAIL OPTIONS.

FARMER'S MARKET DOG PARK.

THEY WANT OUTDOOR ADVENTURE TYPE ACTIVITIES AS WELL AS WATER ACCESS, AND THEN ADULT FITNESS, WELLNESS AND ARTS AND CULTURAL PROGRAMING.

THIS IS A THIS SHOWS US THE FUND BALANCE, REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR OUR PARK SALES TAX OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, WITHOUT THE PARK SALES TAX RENEWAL, WE WILL END AT A ZERO BALANCE WHEN IT EXPIRES IN 2025.

THIS IS DIRECTION FINDER AND MASTER PLAN SURVEY DATA.

AND REALLY WHAT THIS TELLS US IS OUR RESIDENTS WANT US TO CONTINUE WHAT WE'VE DONE FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS.

OUR RESIDENTS LOVE OUR PARKS.

THEY TELL US EVERY TIME WE ASK THEM THAT THEY LOVE OUR PARKS AND THEY LOVE WHAT WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO DO WITH THE LAST PARK SALES MAINTENANCE TAX.

LET'S REVIEW A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, THE STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, SUNSETS IN MARCH 31ST OF 2024.

AND THIS SALES TAX WAS APPROVED NOVEMBER 13.

CITIZENS OF OLIVA ALETHA APPROVED A $0.38 SALES TAX FOR STREET MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION.

THAT SALES TAX STARTED ON APRIL 1ST OF 2014.

THIS IS ONE SNAPSHOT OF OUR DIRECTION FINDER SURVEY.

AND AGAIN, MAINTENANCE OF CITY STREETS, BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN THE TOP ONE OR TWO PRIORITY FOR ALL OF OUR RESIDENTS IN THE CITY OF OLETA.

WE TALK ABOUT THIS EVERY TIME WE TALK ABOUT STREET MAINTENANCE.

AND THAT IS IF WE INVEST A DOLLAR NOW IN BEING ABLE TO PRESERVE OUR STREET NETWORK, WE WILL SAVE $8 IN RECONSTRUCTION LATER WHEN THAT STREET FAILS.

THIS HAS SERVED US LONG TERM ON BEING ABLE TO COME OUT OF WHAT WE HAD WAS AN OVERALL POOR CONDITION INDEX OF OUR STREETS AND BROUGHT US REALLY IN THE LAST NINE YEARS TO BE ABLE TO STABILIZE OUR STREET CONDITION AND HAVE A PROGRAM THAT REALLY SHOWS PROGRESS.

THIS IS THE PROGRESS THAT IT SHOWS.

THE IMPACT OF INSUFFICIENT FUNDING WAS REALLY FELT MOST ON LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS BECAUSE OF PRIORITIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION.

BEFORE WE HAD STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, OUR PRIORITY WERE ARTERIAL ROADS.

AND YOU CAN SEE ON THIS GRAPH ON THE LEFT SIDE IS WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH IN STREET PRESERVATION FROM 2004 TO 2013.

AND ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS THE NINE YEARS OF 2014 TO 2022.

YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S 139 LANE MILES VERSUS 824 LANE MILES SHOWN ON THIS.

AND REALLY THE BENEFIT IS LOCAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS THAT ARE NOW BEING RESURFACED AND ABLE TO BE TREATED.

WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT OCI, BUT IN 2010 I WAS UP HERE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT WE HAD AN OVERINFLATED CONDITION INDEX.

[01:05:04]

AND THE REASON WE DID IS BECAUSE WE HAD A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT WITH NEW STREETS THAT WERE NOT SHOWING US THE PICTURE THAT WE WERE SEEING IN THE FIELD.

WE HAD A LOT OF STREETS THAT WERE DETERIORATING AND THEY WERE DETERIORATING RAPIDLY.

AND WE TALKED ABOUT BEING ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THAT BEFORE WE SAW THE WE SEE THE BOTTOM OF THAT STREET MAINTENANCE.

AND SO THE RESIDENTS PASSED A 3/8 IN SALES TAX.

AND YOU CAN SEE IN THIS CHART, ORANGE BARS ARE WITHOUT STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, BLUE BARS ARE WITH STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX.

AND SO FROM 2010 TO 2013, WE SAW A STEADY DECLINE IN OUR OVERALL CONDITION INDEX OF OUR STREET NETWORK.

ONCE THE SALES TAX WAS PASSED AND WE STARTED PUTTING DOLLARS INTO THAT PROGRAM, WE SAW AN INCLINE OF THAT OVERALL CONDITION INDEX EXCEPT FOR 2020, WHERE WE SAW ONE OF THE HARSHEST WINTERS WE'VE SEEN IN QUITE A LONG TIME.

THEN WE SEE THE INCLINE IN OVERALL CONDITION INDEX AGAIN.

BUT THAT BRINGS US TO 2025, WHERE WITHOUT THE STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, THIS IS WHAT OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PREDICTS WILL HAPPEN TO OUR STREET OVERALL CONDITION INDEX WITH OUR FUNDING FROM THE GENERAL FUND.

THIS IS THE STREET PRESERVATION PROGRAM BALANCE SHEET.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT AS OF THE END OF 2024 ST MAINTENANCE SALES TAX WILL NO LONGER BE INFUSED INTO THE PROGRAM AND WE WOULD BE LEFT WITH 3.4 MILLION OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE YEARS IN THE FUTURE.

THIS IS A GREAT SLIDE BECAUSE MAPS SHOW US SO MUCH.

BUT ON THE LEFT SIDE, THIS IS THE NEXT FIVE YEARS FOR STREET PRESERVATION.

THE LEFT SIDE SHOWS US NO STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, AND THE RIGHT SIDE SHOWS US A CONTINUATION OF THE THREE EIGHT SIN SALES TAX THAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY.

YOU'LL NOTICE THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT TOTAL LANE MILES WITH STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX OF 565 AND WITHOUT STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX. AN AVERAGE OF ONLY 50 LANE MILES.

SO WHY RENEW STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX AND PARK SALES TAX AT THE SAME TIME? WE BELIEVE THAT IT REALLY PROVIDES TRANSPARENCY TO VOTERS.

IT IS MORE EFFICIENT AND I THINK RESPONSIBLE AND COST EFFECTIVE TO HAVE ONLY ONE ELECTION.

BUT IT ALSO SHOWS THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO COME TO YOU AND THEN COME TO YOU A YEAR LATER.

WE'RE GOING TO GIVE YOU BOTH OF THESE ITEMS TO VOTE ON, SEPARATE ITEMS TO VOTE ON, BUT ON THE SAME BALLOT.

SO YOU CAN CONSIDER BOTH OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME.

THE RENEWAL TIMELINE COUNCIL HAS ORDINANCES TO CONSIDER TONIGHT.

THOSE PROPOSED ORDINANCES CALL FOR STREET MAINTENANCE, SALES TAX AND PARK SALES TAX RENEWAL ELECTIONS ON APRIL 25TH OF 2023 AS A MAIL IN BALLOT. SOMETIME IN DECEMBER, JANUARY, THE ORDINANCE WILL BE PUBLISHED AND STAFF NOTIFIES THE JOHNSON COUNTY ELECTION OFFICE.

AND THEN AGAIN, APRIL 25TH OF 2023 IS ELECTION DAY.

WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO NOW IS GO OVER THE SPECIFIC BALLOT LANGUAGE FOR BOTH PARK SALES TAX AND STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX AND GO OVER WHAT IT WAS EIGHT OR NINE YEARS AGO AND THEN WHAT IT IS BEING PROPOSED FOR THE BALLOT IN 2023.

THE FIRST CHANGE YOU SEE IS SHALL WAS CHANGED TO SHOULD AND THAT WAS BECAUSE STAFF BELIEVES THAT THAT'S JUST A LITTLE BIT EASIER TO UNDERSTAND WHEN WE TALK ABOUT BALLOT. WE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF FEEDBACK THAT IT WAS A LITTLE CONFUSING WITH SHELL SO THAT WAS CHANGED TO SHOULD WE CHANGED 2015 TO 2025? WE CHANGED 2025 TO 2035.

AND FOR PARK SALES TAX, WE AGAIN, WE CHANGE SHELL TO TWO.

SO IT READS A LITTLE BIT EASIER PLAIN LANGUAGE.

AND THEN LATER WE CHANGE SHELL TO WILL AGAIN, PLAIN LANGUAGE JUST TO MAKE IT READ A LITTLE BIT EASIER AS YOU'RE IN THE BALLOT.

STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX.

THERE'S A COUPLE ADDITIONAL CHANGES, AND ONLY BECAUSE THIS IS THE FIRST RENEWAL OF STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX, IT WILL BE THE SECOND RENEWAL OF PARK SALES TAX.

SO THE FIRST IS WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT SHALL TO SHOULD THEN WE ADDED RENEW.

WE CHANGED ADDITIONAL TO RENEWED BECAUSE WE'RE RENEWING.

THE DATES WERE CHANGED FROM 2014 TO 2024 AND 2024 TO 2034.

AND THEN AT THE END, BECAUSE THIS IS A RENEWAL, WE ADDED THE EXACT SAME LANGUAGE THAT WE HAD IN THE PARK SALES TAX DRAFT LANGUAGE, AND THAT'S IF APPROVES, SUCH

[01:10:04]

TAX WILL CONTINUE THE CITY'S CURRENT ONE AND ONE HALF PERCENT.

TO MAKE THAT EXACTLY THE SAME LANGUAGE AT THE END IS THE PARK SALES TAX.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU TONIGHT.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER THEM OTHERWISE BEFORE YOU.

IS TWO PROPOSED ORDINANCES FOR YOU TO CONSIDER FOR BOTH THE PARK SALES TAX AND STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX RENEWALS? THANK YOU, MARY. REAL QUICK.

THERE WAS ANOTHER SMALL LITTLE CHANGE THAT WE RECEIVED TONIGHT ON ON THE DAIS HERE.

THEY ADDED A FEW MORE WORDS AFTER THIS IS ON THE STREET MAINTENANCE.

JUST UPGRADING AND IMPROVING.

RIGHT. IT WAS INTENDED, MAYOR, TO JUST MAKE SURE WE'RE WE'RE NOT CHANGING ANY LANGUAGE FROM THE PRIOR ONE ANY MORE THAN WE NEEDED TO.

THAT LANGUAGE WAS IN THE PRIOR ONE.

WE JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT CLARIFYING EDIT AND ALSO THE CLARIFYING EDIT ON THE TITLE OF IT BEING THE STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.

NOTHING REALLY SUBSTANTIAL.

NOTHING IS THE LANGUAGE THAT WE'RE PROPOSING.

OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER VOTE.

DID YOU EVER. YEAH, IT WAS GOING TO JUST HAVE CLARIFICATION ABOUT THE ELECTION ITSELF.

WILL THIS BE A MAIL IN BALLOT? YES. ON THAT POINT IS THIS ARE WE AUTHORIZING THE MONEY TONIGHT? I DON'T I DIDN'T SEE THAT FISCAL IMPACT NOTED ON OUR ITEM.

SO THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE FUNDING IS NOT TONIGHT.

IT'S THE AUTHORIZATION TO PUT THE LANGUAGE ON A BALLOT IN 2023.

WHEN WILL YOU NEED. WE DO ANTICIPATE FUNDING.

WELL, WE ANTICIPATE REVENUES TO BE ABOUT 17 MILLION IN 2023 FOR STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX AND ABOUT 5.6 TO 6 MILLION FOR PARK SALES TAX.

THAT FUNDING WOULD BE AUTHORIZED ACTUALLY, JUST LIKE YOU WOULD NORMALLY SEE IT.

SO FOR THAT YEAR, WE WOULD HAVE THAT AUTHORIZATION IN JANUARY, WHETHER THAT'S STREET MAINTENANCE, SALES TAX OR FOR A SPECIFIC PROJECT FOR PARK SALES TAX, FOR THE FUNDING FOR THAT.

WE PAY THE COUNTY FOR THE MAIL IN BALLOT ELECTION.

WHEN WILL WE NEED TO OFFER WE'LL BRING IT BACK.

WE'LL BRING THAT BACK IN JANUARY.

BACK IN JANUARY. YEAH.

SORRY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF COUNCIL MEMBER GILMORE.

ON THAT SAME NOTE, MAYOR, JUST AGAIN, I KNOW FOR THE PUBLIC'S BENEFIT, ALL THE ALL THE REASONS YOU STATED ABOUT TRANSPARENCY AND AFFORDABILITY AND EFFICIENCY THAT I RECALLING, THAT'S ABOUT A $325,000 COST FOR A SINGLE ELECTION.

SO WE'RE SAVING THAT MUCH BY DOING THIS ONCE INSTEAD OF TWICE.

SO I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT FISCAL NOTE TO REMEMBER.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU.

GOOD. AS FAR AS THE EDUCATION PROCESS THAT WILL BE.

WELL, WE. WELL, WE PUT OUT A LIST OF PROJECTS POTENTIALLY OR.

WILL WE CONTINUE THE OVERSIGHT? SO THE STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

YES, WE'LL CONTINUE.

AND AS FAR AS SPECIFIC PROJECTS FOR PARK SALES TAX, WE WILL COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL AND TALK ABOUT THE TRAILS AND GREENWAYS PLAN, AS WELL AS SOME PROPOSED PROJECTS THAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE PLAN.

AND THEN WE WILL COME BACK, I BELIEVE, IN FEBRUARY OR MARCH AND TALK ABOUT WHAT THAT PARKS AND REC PLAN LOOK LIKE AND WHAT THOSE PROPOSED PROJECTS ARE.

AND SO WE'RE GETTING THAT PROCESS UP AND RUNNING AS FAST AS WE CAN TO JUST KIND OF SHOW BACK IN INFORMATION WHAT SOME OF THOSE PROJECTS MIGHT BE WITH THIS PROPOSED SALES TAX.

ALL RIGHT. ABSOLUTELY.

SO THIS IS KIND OF OUR FIRST STEP.

YES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? WELL, THEN. MOVE TO ITEM C, CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22, DASH 62 CALLING FOR AN APRIL 25, 2023 ELECTION IN THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING ON A PROPOSITION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO RENEW A 3/8 OF 1% SPECIAL PURPOSE CITYWIDE RETAILER SALES TAX TO BE USED TO REPAIR, REBUILD AND REHABILITATE THE STREETS AND ALETHA.

MOTION WOULD BE IN ORDER TO MOVE THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22 DASH 62 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION TO THE SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MR. GILMORE. YES, MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS.

VOTE YES.

MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MS. FELTER? YES.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

ITEM D IS CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22 DASH 63 CALLING ON AN APRIL 25TH, 2023 ELECTION IN THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING ON A PROPOSITION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO LEVY A ONE EIGHTH OF 1% SPECIAL PURPOSE CITYWIDE RETAILERS SALES TAX TO BE USED TO PREPARE, REPAIR, RESTORE, IMPROVE

[01:15:09]

AND ACQUIRE PUBLIC PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION AREAS IN THE CITY AND TO ENHANCE LIBRARY SERVICES.

I MOVE THE B IN ORDER, I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22, DASH 63 AS PRESENTED.

WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MS..

FILTER. YES, MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS.

VOTE YES. MR. BACON. YES, MISS ESSEX? YES. MOTION PASSES.

SIX ZERO. NOW MOVING TO ITEM E, ITEM IS CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22, DASH 64 AMENDING CHAPTER

[E. Consideration of Ordinance No. 22-64 amending Chapter 15.04 of the Olathe Municipal Code pertaining to the Residential Code for One- and Two-Family Dwellings to require under-stairway protection.]

15.4 OF THE OLATHE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS TO REQUIRE UNDER STAIRWAY PROTECTION. THIS IS ITEM AT OUR NOVEMBER 15TH COUNCIL MEETING.

ARE THERE ANY. QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR NEED FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM.

A MOTION BE IN ORDER.

I MOVE THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22 DASH 64 AS PRESENTED.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND WITH THE CITY CLERK.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MISS ESSEX.

YES, MISS FELTER? YES, MR. GILMORE? YES, MR. MCCOY? YES, MISS VOTE.

YES, MR. BACON. YES.

MOTION PASSES. SIX ZERO.

WELL, NOW, MOVE TO NEW CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS.

[10. NEW CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS]

I'LL START ON MY LEFT.